|
|
 |
|
Electronic torture victim explains what it's like
while being tortured in Akron, Ohio.
Suzanne LeBoeuf offers her view about why electronic torture takes place in the
U.S. and globally. More information can be found by going to http://suzstop.googlepages.com
Electrowell is a 501 (c) 3 nonprofit, and expresses its gratitude for Rose Wilcher's
www.FreedomJournal.Tv
FROM OUR ATTORNEY June 25, 2008 Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance P.O. Box 9022 Cincinnati,
Ohio 45209
Re: Report of Litigation Status
Dear Members:
This law firm represents Freedom from Covert
Harassment and Surveillance ("Freedom"). Since January, we have been looking into litigation against government agencies
and contractors surrounding the use of directed energy weapons and similar technologies against United States citizens.
We have been conducting factual research based on the reports of targeted individuals, technological reports, and other avenues
of information. We have also been analyzing the information in terms of various potential legal causes of action and remedies.
Thank you to everyone who has contributed information to this cause. The firm has received hundreds of letters,
emails and phone calls. Due to the size of this undertaking, we have not been able to respond to everyone, however,
we appreciate your input, we are taking your reports seriously, and we are considering your information in light of the
overarching legal analysis.
At this point, we have completed an initial analysis of potential litigation and it
appears the most effective strategy would be to sue under a small number of plaintiffs rather than as a class. Many suits based
on similar allegations have failed and we have been analyzing the best strategies to avoid dismissal or an adverse verdict.
Based on the information we have received, the core issues and potential defendants are too diverse amongst FFCHS members
to be limited to a class action. In other words, a class action is not recommended because many members are being targeted
by different, unconnected perpetrators, and the reports of targeting techniques, technologies and methods are too varied
to fit into a class action. Therefore, it makes sense to select the TIs whose abuse is best supported by evidence. By
this manner, the case will also be more manageable. If a suit is successful, it should open up the courts to other TIs
to bring individual or group actions.
If you are not a plaintiff, this does not mean you are disbelieved. Rather,
TIs who are not plaintiffs have suffered as much as the others. If just happened that evidence was able to be collected
by the plaintiffs who will further a suit.
In this current stage, we are contacting potential experts and lay witnesses
who may be able to testify in furtherance of a civil action as well as trying to obtain evidence to be used in court. We
have relied upon representations of members as to the strength of evidence, but the evidence must be authenticated and
admissible in court. We will recommend filing a complaint only if the witnesses and evidence are sufficient to proceed.
If we were to proceed with too little, and the case were dismissed, it could jeopardize the plaintiffs' access to court
in the future.
Please continue to submit questionnaires, surveys, reports, records of evidence, contact information
for good expert and lay witnesses, and useful technological information. Thank you again for helping Freedom work toward
a decisive legal decision in order to stop the inhumane harassment and surveillance.
Very truly yours, Jon
Wilson
|
 |
Listen to radio interview on WNIR with Suz LeBoeuf: 5/13/08 This is Suzanne "Suz" LeBoeuf, a "Target" or TI (Targeted
Individual) calling in to radio talk show host Tom Erickson, WNIR radio http://www.wnir.com to tell his listener's that U.S.
citizen's are being assaulted or attacked by radiological weapons in an attempt to take their lives. I have been a torture
victim since at least 1974 that I know of.
Suzanne's Torture Videos, Audios (2005-2007).
then search icsn2202 and electrowell.
US Army toyed with telepathic ray gun
12:00 21 March 2008
NewScientist.com news service
David Hambling
A recently declassified US Army report on the biological effects of non-lethal weapons reveals outlandish plans for "ray
gun" devices, which would cause artificial fevers or beam voices into people's heads.
The report titled "Bioeffects Of Selected Nonlethal Weapons" was released under the US Freedom of
Information Act and is available on this website (pdf). The DoD has confirmed to New Scientist that it released the documents, which detail
five different "maturing non-lethal technologies" using microwaves, lasers and sound.
Released by US Army Intelligence and Security Command at Fort Meade, Maryland, US, the 1998 report gives an overview
of what was then the state of the art in directed energy weapons for crowd control and other applications.
A word in your ear
Some of the technologies are conceptual, such as an electromagnetic pulse that causes a seizure like those experienced
by people with epilepsy. Other ideas, like a microwave gun to "beam" words directly into people's ears, have been tested.
It is claimed that the so-called "Frey Effect" – using close-range microwaves to produce audible sounds in a person's
ears – has been used to project the spoken numbers 1 to 10 across a lab to volunteers'.
The report also discusses a microwave weapon able to produce a disabling "artificial fever" by heating a person's body.
While tests of the idea are not mentioned, the report notes that the necessary equipment "is available today". It adds that
while it would take at least fifteen minutes to achieve the desired "fever" effect, it could be used to incapacitate people
for almost "any desired period consistent with safety."
Less exotic technologies discussed include laser dazzlers and a sound source loud enough to disturb the sense of balance.
Both have been realised in the years since the report was written. The US army uses laser dazzlers in Iraq, while the Long
Range Acoustic Device has military and civilian users, and has been used on one occasion to repel pirates off Somalia.
However, the report does not mention any trials of weapons for producing artificial fever or seizures, or beaming voices
into people's heads.
Potentially torturous
Steve Wright, a security expert at Leeds Metropolitan University, UK, warns that the technologies described could be used for torture.
In 1998 the European Parliament passed a motion banning potentially dangerous incapacitating technologies that interfere with
the human brain.
"The epileptic seizure inducing device is grossly irresponsible and should never be fielded," says Steve Wright "We know
from similar [chemically] artificially-induced fits that the victim subsequently remains "potentiated" and may spontaneously
suffer epileptic fits again after the initial attack."
The acoustic energy device that affects the ear canals, disrupting the motion sense, may require dangerously loud sound
levels to be effective, points out Juergen Altmann, a physicist at Dortmund University, Germany, who is interested in new
military technologies.
"[There is] inconsistency between the part that says "interesting" effects occur at 130-155 dB and the Recovery/Safety
section that says that 115 dB is to be avoided - without commenting on the difference."
Weapons Technology - Keep up with the latest innovations in our cutting edge special report.
Focus on America - Delve into the science and technology questions facing the USA in our special report.
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |